🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have decided to pull out from an international accord designed to protect females from abuse, including domestic abuse, following extensive and intense debates in the parliament.

Thousands of demonstrators assembled in Riga this past week to voice disagreement with the vote. The ultimate decision now lies with Head of State the nation's president, who must determine whether to endorse or reject the proposed law.

Known as the European treaty, the 2011 agreement only took effect in Latvia last twelve months ago, requiring authorities to develop legal frameworks and assistance programs to end all types of abuse.

Latvia has become the initial EU country to begin the process of exiting from the treaty. The transcontinental nation pulled out in 2021, a move that rights groups described as a significant setback for gender equality.

Political Debate and Opposition

The treaty was ratified by the European Union in last year, yet conservative factions have contended that its emphasis on equal rights weakens traditional families and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Latvian parliament, MPs decided 56 to 32 to withdraw from the treaty, a action sponsored by opposition parties but supported by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The outcome represents a setback for centre-right government leader Evika Silina, who joined demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that violence will not prevail," she stated to the crowd.

Political Disagreements and Responses

One of the primary parties advocating for the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose head has urged citizens to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

The nation's ombudswoman Karina Palkova appealed for the treaty not to be politicized, while the organization the rights organization asserted it was "not a threat to national principles, it served as a tool to realize them".

The Thursday's decision has provoked broad protest both inside Latvia and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have signed a Latvian petition calling for the treaty to be preserved. The gender equality group the rights center has announced a demonstration for the coming week, charging MPs of ignoring the wishes of the nation's citizens.

Global Concerns and Possible Future Actions

The head of the Council of Europe's legislative body stated that Latvia had made a rash choice driven by false information. He described it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying step backward for female equality and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation left the treaty in 2021, instances of gender-based killings and abuse targeting females had risen sharply.

Because the decision did not secure a two-thirds support, the head of state could potentially return the bill for further consideration if he has objections.

President Rinkevics stated on social media that he would assess the decision according to constitutional requirements, "taking into account state and legal considerations, instead of belief-based viewpoints".

Last week, another member of the governing alliance, the reformist party, suggested it would not exclude appealing to the supreme judicial body.

"This vote represents a concerning situation for women's rights not only in our nation but throughout the continent," stated a human rights advocate.

• Family violence statistics have been increasing in several European countries
• The Istanbul Convention mandates specific safeguards for survivors of gender-based violence
• Latvia's decision could affect similar discussions in other member states